Price is going to depend on moulding/production cost what method is used is crucial, cost of masters, printing etc and everything else which goes with manufacturing a product generally, though smaller sets are unlikely to be significantly cheaper as cost of sculpting is way down the list on expenses so fewer figures doesn't necesarily mean a cheaper set...
What may happen is they produce a short run injection tool for several sets on the same sprue and then cut them up to produce the different sets...
Zvezda also seem to be reissuing there older sets at least the ones I bought recently were all brand new (new slightly different format sealed boxes) and less then 10€ a box, so maybe more will follow :wink:

I assume that the minisets will provide those unique figures that you don't want multiple copies, who needs several goats being dispatched, and will be quite costly because you will probably only buy one of them. This is fine by me. Allows you to make those little vignettes that gives an army flavour without having loads of excess figures that you've got no use. Obviously, I want figures as cheap as possible but no point if manufacturers can't make a return.

Nicely sculpted masters as always from Linear-A! I do have a few concerns though, although for many they are smaller quibbles that do not detract from the figures much.

1) The shield positioning from Linear-A has me concerned compared to what Strelets Mini was able to do in their Ancient/Medieval sets, particularly the early editions (STRM001 through STRM020). Set #017 seems very flat, and having the two pick axe wielding men in full armour would have been strange even in the Kalkriese ambush situation (they would become fatigued extremely quickly in that kit). The shield bearing pose in Set #030 looks quite unnatural, and one of the shown poses in Set #020 suffers from severe case of flatness as well, although the Thera spearman on the far left is a sublime pose. Give me 12 poses of that spearman with and without helmets and I would be a very happy archaeologist.

2) PSR mentioned this for the Etruscan cavalry set's female pose as well, but the amphorae jar the Greek in Set #019 is carrying would have been really heavy and prone to breaking the handle of the jar. These were not made of steel and archaeological remains have proven they were one of the most prone parts of the jar to break. The Greeks, particularly hoplites, also brought a lot of servants/attendants with them on campaign, so having a warrior carrying a jar like this and bearing his full military equipment is probably anachronistic; it would take Philip II of Macedon's reforms before Greco-Macedonian warriors started consistently carrying their own supplies.

I love to see the attempts though, as all the figures have their uses when put in the right situation. Have a nice day everyone! :sunglasses: