| Subject: |
|
Re: Re: I agree with Hidden |
| Name: |
|
Brian L Cramer |
| Date Posted: |
|
Jan 1, 07 - 2:24 AM |
| Email: |
|
grrrrrrrrr@yahoo.com |
| Message: |
|
Ok Nick,
1st point
The only allegations I make are of the bias and inaccuracies of the unsigned reports of the selectmen’s meetings, THAT ARE STILL POSTED on YOUR WEBSITE how can you not respond?? Don’t you stand by what is reported in your own website? Aren’t you going to take responsibility for any misinformation on YOUR website? What old disputes are you referring to? I am only concerned about the truth being told. Someone who does not respond is also perceived as guilty or you pleading the 5th?
2nd point
“But I will call your attention to the fact that there have not been any "political" arguments since last June's elections, That may tell you something.
Yes, Nick it tells me you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Let’s review some of the hot topics since June. 1. MMA and the insurance issue on the common. 2. The lack of action to appoint Barry Norris as Fire Chief 3. Barrett Hill Rd. issue, by the way which has not been resolved. 4. The FALSE reporting from this website that the caterer at Union Fair violated conditions of serving alcohol. 5. The TABOR issue. 6. (Not sure this one counts) the accusation, from Al, of Bill Packard micro-managing public works, I’m not sure of the details but from reading the minutes it sounded a little heated.
I can see you are trying to take a dig at me. “Since Bill and John have replaced Brian and Dyane everything is so much better now” I hope no one really believes that.
3rd point
Please go back and read what I posted: “If you take away the “sponsors” who started this newsletter/website you would only have two, Hannibal’s and Quarry House Antiques.”
As I stated Hannibal’s and Quarry House were the only two who were not around in the beginning, well hmmmm I should have inserted the word “remaining” or “left” after the word “two” to make it a little more clear. Regardless, I am very aware who started this website.
4th point
What is inappropriate about my comments about Quarry House? Were they false? For goodness sake the town had to create a separate budget line item just for her lawsuit that I believe went to the Maine Supreme Court, which she ended up losing. I also believe it ended up costing the town somewhere in the area of $10,000. Please correct me if I am wrong about any of that information. Maybe you could do a little investigation on it.
5th point
You mention that you have been running the website by yourself for the past couple of months? I’m not surprised; some people took advantage of you. They used you for their own purposes and once they got it left you holding the bag. That was observation made by someone else, not by me.
6th point
I also applaud your efforts; remember it’s only the “government” portion I have a problem with.
7th point
There is no way I will take your hand in friendship until you take down your paragraph about the Town & Manager. You insulted the entire form of government in this town. You referred to the elected officials as a do-little board of selectmen. You made a personal attack against me referring that I wasn’t dedicated or serious about my position. That is a down right LIE. I was greatly offended by those remarks and still am. I also again demand to know what hidden agendas that the board supposedly had. You also make accusations of retaliations; I also demand to know what you are referring to. If you can’t support those accusations then it bears another reason why that paragraph needs to be removed. |
|
Replies:
|
|
|
|
|
Reply
Home
bravenet.com
